The Brevard Association of Human Services – 2009 BAHS Annual Senior Health Fair
November 11, 2009
8:00am – 1:00pm
Hilton Rialto Hotel
For More Information Click Here >>
Showing posts with label florida. Show all posts
Showing posts with label florida. Show all posts
Sunday, October 18, 2009
Thursday, July 16, 2009
Common Mistakes in Estate Planning (Part Two)
The first part of this article described five common mistakes made in estate planning and the kinds of trust protection that should be provided children. This second part will list other common mistakes in estate planning.
MISTAKE #6 – PARENTS WHO FAIL TO HAVE ENOUGH LIFE INSURANCE
I don’t sell life insurance, so readers with minor children should not view the following advice as self-serving. The average amount of life insurance provided by employers is two or three times annual salary. Additional accidental death insurance may be provided, but most people don’t die as a result of an accident and never collect on this type of life insurance. Two or three times annual salary sounds like a lot of money, unless the primary wage earner has just died and you are raising two or three minor children. Unless financial sacrifices are made or there is a surviving spouse willing and able to work, the typical amount of employer life insurance won’t last five years or provide nearly enough for the college education of each child. Additional funds in retirement plans should not be considered “life insurance” because it will be heavily taxed if withdrawn and may be needed for the future support of a surviving spouse. Until the youngest child has completed their education, most families need and should purchase additional life insurance protection to replace lost income and fund each child’s college education. Term life insurance is available from numerous companies and in most cases at an annual premium cost of 1/10th of 1% of the coverage provided. Parents with minor children should review their options with a life insurance advisor.
MISTAKE #7 - FAILING TO MATCH OLD BENEFICIARY DESIGNATIONS WITH NEW ESTATE PLANS
For many families with minor children, the parents’ life insurance and retirement plan accounts equal most of what their children may inherit. Only the most recent beneficiary designation forms on file with each life insurance company and retirement plan administrator will control these funds, even if the parents have adopted new estate plans with trust protection for their children. Most married persons know (or assume) their spouse is designated as primary beneficiary of all life insurance and retirement funds, but few persons are certain who is designated as secondary beneficiary. If there is no surviving spouse and the children have been designated secondary beneficiaries, each child will receive their share of the life insurance and retirement funds when they reach age 18, regardless of any different estate plan with trust protection adopted by the parents. To prevent this mistake, new beneficiary designation forms on all life insurance and retirement accounts should be updated at the same time new estate plans are adopted.
While it may be appropriate for the surviving spouse to remain designated as primary beneficiary, the new Will or Trust Agreement established to provide the children with standby trust protection should be specifically designated as contingent beneficiary. This action is critically important and due to privacy laws, cannot always be handled by the attorney who has assisted with the new estate plan.
MISTAKE #8 - DEFEATING AN ESTATE PLAN BY JOINT OWNERSHIP
An estate plan is not worth the paper it is written on, if the Will or Trust Agreement does not solely control the assets. Just as outdated beneficiary designation forms may still control the distribution of life insurance or retirement funds, an asset titled in joint names with one or more other persons may defeat the intent of an estate plan, result in additional taxes and risk loss of the asset itself. For example, joint ownership by a husband and wife typically results in the surviving spouse being the automatic and sole owner upon the death of the other spouse. Legal proceedings are usually not required and any contrary instructions in the Will or Trust Agreement of the first spouse to die will be disregarded. The same and a potentially worse result occurs when joint ownership with right of survivorship is created by a parent and their children in order to avoid probate. For estate tax purposes, such arrangements are often disregarded by the IRS. For asset protection purposes, creditors of a child listed as a joint owner may be able to attach or force the sale of such joint assets in order to collect against the child’s share.
Special care must be taken in creating joint ownership of real estate. Even if only avoiding probate is intended, all joint owners will be required to execute future transfer deeds or loan documents. In addition, the homestead tax and other exemptions available on a residence may be jeopardized.
MISTAKE #9 – DO-IT-YOURSELF ESTATE PLANNING
At the risk of sounding self-serving, this last item is too important to ignore. Because the services of an attorney can be expensive, estate planning is often delayed or attempted through internet or paralegal sources. Unfortunately, single parents and families with limited resources may need estate planning the most, but receive it the least. My recommendations are:
DO locate a qualified estate planning advisor by asking friends, tax or financial advisors or free legal referral services for one or more recommendations;
DO obtain an estimate of fees and any costs up front. Many attorneys charge only a nominal consultation fee and should be expected to discuss their fee and payment arrangement at that time. If the fee sounds too high, keep looking;
DO provide your advisor with a complete list of current assets and how titled, life insurance coverage and the current beneficiaries, copies of any existing wills or divorce decrees and information about family members, intended legal guardians and possible trustees;
DON’T rely on internet or other sources of legal forms that are not current, that are not specifically prepared for Florida residents or that you do not fully understand. The execution requirements for Florida documents is complicated, is different than some other states and should be supervised by some one familiar with these requirements; and
DON’T put off until tomorrow what you should do for your family today.
MISTAKE #6 – PARENTS WHO FAIL TO HAVE ENOUGH LIFE INSURANCE
I don’t sell life insurance, so readers with minor children should not view the following advice as self-serving. The average amount of life insurance provided by employers is two or three times annual salary. Additional accidental death insurance may be provided, but most people don’t die as a result of an accident and never collect on this type of life insurance. Two or three times annual salary sounds like a lot of money, unless the primary wage earner has just died and you are raising two or three minor children. Unless financial sacrifices are made or there is a surviving spouse willing and able to work, the typical amount of employer life insurance won’t last five years or provide nearly enough for the college education of each child. Additional funds in retirement plans should not be considered “life insurance” because it will be heavily taxed if withdrawn and may be needed for the future support of a surviving spouse. Until the youngest child has completed their education, most families need and should purchase additional life insurance protection to replace lost income and fund each child’s college education. Term life insurance is available from numerous companies and in most cases at an annual premium cost of 1/10th of 1% of the coverage provided. Parents with minor children should review their options with a life insurance advisor.
MISTAKE #7 - FAILING TO MATCH OLD BENEFICIARY DESIGNATIONS WITH NEW ESTATE PLANS
For many families with minor children, the parents’ life insurance and retirement plan accounts equal most of what their children may inherit. Only the most recent beneficiary designation forms on file with each life insurance company and retirement plan administrator will control these funds, even if the parents have adopted new estate plans with trust protection for their children. Most married persons know (or assume) their spouse is designated as primary beneficiary of all life insurance and retirement funds, but few persons are certain who is designated as secondary beneficiary. If there is no surviving spouse and the children have been designated secondary beneficiaries, each child will receive their share of the life insurance and retirement funds when they reach age 18, regardless of any different estate plan with trust protection adopted by the parents. To prevent this mistake, new beneficiary designation forms on all life insurance and retirement accounts should be updated at the same time new estate plans are adopted.
While it may be appropriate for the surviving spouse to remain designated as primary beneficiary, the new Will or Trust Agreement established to provide the children with standby trust protection should be specifically designated as contingent beneficiary. This action is critically important and due to privacy laws, cannot always be handled by the attorney who has assisted with the new estate plan.
MISTAKE #8 - DEFEATING AN ESTATE PLAN BY JOINT OWNERSHIP
An estate plan is not worth the paper it is written on, if the Will or Trust Agreement does not solely control the assets. Just as outdated beneficiary designation forms may still control the distribution of life insurance or retirement funds, an asset titled in joint names with one or more other persons may defeat the intent of an estate plan, result in additional taxes and risk loss of the asset itself. For example, joint ownership by a husband and wife typically results in the surviving spouse being the automatic and sole owner upon the death of the other spouse. Legal proceedings are usually not required and any contrary instructions in the Will or Trust Agreement of the first spouse to die will be disregarded. The same and a potentially worse result occurs when joint ownership with right of survivorship is created by a parent and their children in order to avoid probate. For estate tax purposes, such arrangements are often disregarded by the IRS. For asset protection purposes, creditors of a child listed as a joint owner may be able to attach or force the sale of such joint assets in order to collect against the child’s share.
Special care must be taken in creating joint ownership of real estate. Even if only avoiding probate is intended, all joint owners will be required to execute future transfer deeds or loan documents. In addition, the homestead tax and other exemptions available on a residence may be jeopardized.
MISTAKE #9 – DO-IT-YOURSELF ESTATE PLANNING
At the risk of sounding self-serving, this last item is too important to ignore. Because the services of an attorney can be expensive, estate planning is often delayed or attempted through internet or paralegal sources. Unfortunately, single parents and families with limited resources may need estate planning the most, but receive it the least. My recommendations are:
DO locate a qualified estate planning advisor by asking friends, tax or financial advisors or free legal referral services for one or more recommendations;
DO obtain an estimate of fees and any costs up front. Many attorneys charge only a nominal consultation fee and should be expected to discuss their fee and payment arrangement at that time. If the fee sounds too high, keep looking;
DO provide your advisor with a complete list of current assets and how titled, life insurance coverage and the current beneficiaries, copies of any existing wills or divorce decrees and information about family members, intended legal guardians and possible trustees;
DON’T rely on internet or other sources of legal forms that are not current, that are not specifically prepared for Florida residents or that you do not fully understand. The execution requirements for Florida documents is complicated, is different than some other states and should be supervised by some one familiar with these requirements; and
DON’T put off until tomorrow what you should do for your family today.
Wednesday, July 15, 2009
Common Mistakes in Estate Planning (Part One)
This is the first part of a two-part article which will alert readers to changes they may need to make to their own estate plans. While not having any estate plan in the first place is the greatest mistake, this article assumes the reader has already adopted some form of Will or Trust Agreement. While the mistakes described below and in the next article can result in added financial costs, their impact on the lives of children can be even greater.
MISTAKE #1 – PARENTS WHO FAIL TO ESTABLISH TRUST PROTECTION FOR THEIR CHILDREN
Most people adopt their first Wills in order to designate legal guardians for their minor children. Unfortunately, the authority of a legal guardian terminates when a child attains age 18. At that same age, a child may also gain unrestricted control of their inheritance despite their lack of maturity or the wrongful influence of outside parties at that time. Parents can and should prevent this mistake by providing in their estate plan for the continued trust control of a child’s inheritance until the child’s education is completed and the child has attained a more mature age.
MISTAKE #2 –GRANDPARENTS WHO FAIL TO ESTABLISH STANDBY TRUST PROTECTION FOR THEIR GRANDCHILDREN
The typical Will or Trust Agreement provides that the inheritance due a deceased child shall instead be distributed to the surviving issue of that child. In the event one of their children later dies, grandparents often fail to provide the same trust protection for their grandchildren as recommended above. This mistake by the grandparents often involves an even larger inheritance than the grandchild may receive from their deceased parent and could also result in the control of a grandchild’s inheritance being managed by inlaws or non-family members.
MISTAKE #3 – CREATING UNEQUAL TREATMENT BY PROVIDING EQUAL SHARES TO CHILDREN
The age spread between the oldest and youngest children in a family often ranges from 5 to 15 years. Even when trust protection is provided to prevent a child from inheriting at age 18, an even worse result can occur if each child’s share is made equal without regard to each child’s age. For example, the three surviving children of the Jones family are ages 23, 18 and 12 at the time of their parents’ death. The estate plan of Mr. and Mrs. Jones provides for equal division among the children at their death, followed by distribution as each child attains age 23. Until distribution, each child’s separate share can be used in the discretion of the Trustee toward that child’s support, education and medical care. While Mr. and Mrs. Jones never intended such a result, the older child (whose college education has already been provided by the parents) will receive a full one-third share, the middle child will likely spend all or most of their share in order to complete college, while the youngest child may exhaust their share and never go to college due to lack of funds. This mistake can be prevented by providing trust protection and equal division of assets only after the youngest child has received the same opportunities as each other child (e.g., until the youngest child attains age 22). Until that time, the Trustee can provide support to each of the children according to their needs from time to time (not necessarily in equal amounts) and as the parents would do themselves if living. Once the remaining assets are divided after the youngest child attains the designated age, distribution of each child’s remaining share will occur at such later age of maturity as designated by the parents.
MISTAKE #4 – PARENTS WHO FAIL TO TREAT DIFFERENT CHILDREN DIFFERENTLY
Most parents love their children equally and treat their children equally in their estate plans. The reality in many cases is that once all of the children have reached adulthood, they have achieved different levels of maturity, career and marital success. While parents with a disabled child usually provide special trust protection for that child, the same parents often fail to protect the inheritance of those children threatened by creditors, broken marriages or bad lifestyles. Many options exist for parents to provide all or some of their children with added trust protection and should be discussed with their advisors.
MISTAKE #5 – PICKING THE WRONG TRUSTEE
In selecting a legal guardian who may become the caregiver, mentor and substitute parent for a minor child, my advice has always been to “let your heart rule your head.” In selecting a trustee to manage a child’s inheritance, make investment decisions and say “no” when necessary, you should instead “let your head rule your heart.” The family member or friend, who may be best choice as legal guardian, may be unqualified or overwhelmed with the responsibility of also being trustee. Parents and grandparents alike should consider designating an independent and qualified investment firm or other financial institution to serve as trustee or trust advisor and made responsible for investment management, bill paying and recordkeeping. This is especially important in trust protection arrangements that may last for many years and beyond the lifetimes of friends or family members. When an independent and qualified trustee is designated, I recommend a friend or family member be provided the authority to replace that trustee with another investment firm or financial institution if circumstances or personnel later change. The second part of this article will cover other common estate planning mistakes, including, purchasing life insurance, designating beneficiaries and using joint ownership.
MISTAKE #1 – PARENTS WHO FAIL TO ESTABLISH TRUST PROTECTION FOR THEIR CHILDREN
Most people adopt their first Wills in order to designate legal guardians for their minor children. Unfortunately, the authority of a legal guardian terminates when a child attains age 18. At that same age, a child may also gain unrestricted control of their inheritance despite their lack of maturity or the wrongful influence of outside parties at that time. Parents can and should prevent this mistake by providing in their estate plan for the continued trust control of a child’s inheritance until the child’s education is completed and the child has attained a more mature age.
MISTAKE #2 –GRANDPARENTS WHO FAIL TO ESTABLISH STANDBY TRUST PROTECTION FOR THEIR GRANDCHILDREN
The typical Will or Trust Agreement provides that the inheritance due a deceased child shall instead be distributed to the surviving issue of that child. In the event one of their children later dies, grandparents often fail to provide the same trust protection for their grandchildren as recommended above. This mistake by the grandparents often involves an even larger inheritance than the grandchild may receive from their deceased parent and could also result in the control of a grandchild’s inheritance being managed by inlaws or non-family members.
MISTAKE #3 – CREATING UNEQUAL TREATMENT BY PROVIDING EQUAL SHARES TO CHILDREN
The age spread between the oldest and youngest children in a family often ranges from 5 to 15 years. Even when trust protection is provided to prevent a child from inheriting at age 18, an even worse result can occur if each child’s share is made equal without regard to each child’s age. For example, the three surviving children of the Jones family are ages 23, 18 and 12 at the time of their parents’ death. The estate plan of Mr. and Mrs. Jones provides for equal division among the children at their death, followed by distribution as each child attains age 23. Until distribution, each child’s separate share can be used in the discretion of the Trustee toward that child’s support, education and medical care. While Mr. and Mrs. Jones never intended such a result, the older child (whose college education has already been provided by the parents) will receive a full one-third share, the middle child will likely spend all or most of their share in order to complete college, while the youngest child may exhaust their share and never go to college due to lack of funds. This mistake can be prevented by providing trust protection and equal division of assets only after the youngest child has received the same opportunities as each other child (e.g., until the youngest child attains age 22). Until that time, the Trustee can provide support to each of the children according to their needs from time to time (not necessarily in equal amounts) and as the parents would do themselves if living. Once the remaining assets are divided after the youngest child attains the designated age, distribution of each child’s remaining share will occur at such later age of maturity as designated by the parents.
MISTAKE #4 – PARENTS WHO FAIL TO TREAT DIFFERENT CHILDREN DIFFERENTLY
Most parents love their children equally and treat their children equally in their estate plans. The reality in many cases is that once all of the children have reached adulthood, they have achieved different levels of maturity, career and marital success. While parents with a disabled child usually provide special trust protection for that child, the same parents often fail to protect the inheritance of those children threatened by creditors, broken marriages or bad lifestyles. Many options exist for parents to provide all or some of their children with added trust protection and should be discussed with their advisors.
MISTAKE #5 – PICKING THE WRONG TRUSTEE
In selecting a legal guardian who may become the caregiver, mentor and substitute parent for a minor child, my advice has always been to “let your heart rule your head.” In selecting a trustee to manage a child’s inheritance, make investment decisions and say “no” when necessary, you should instead “let your head rule your heart.” The family member or friend, who may be best choice as legal guardian, may be unqualified or overwhelmed with the responsibility of also being trustee. Parents and grandparents alike should consider designating an independent and qualified investment firm or other financial institution to serve as trustee or trust advisor and made responsible for investment management, bill paying and recordkeeping. This is especially important in trust protection arrangements that may last for many years and beyond the lifetimes of friends or family members. When an independent and qualified trustee is designated, I recommend a friend or family member be provided the authority to replace that trustee with another investment firm or financial institution if circumstances or personnel later change. The second part of this article will cover other common estate planning mistakes, including, purchasing life insurance, designating beneficiaries and using joint ownership.
Developing an Estate Planning Checklist
The only thing worse than having a Will or Trust Agreement that is out of date, is having no estate plan at all. Many estate plans become outdated as children grow older and financial conditions change. Because many people don’t fully understand all the legal provisions and “broiler plate” in their Wills or Trust Agreements, the need to update, and/or replace provisions may not be apparent.
Following is a checklist of Estate Planning issues you should discuss with your advisors, whether to establish an estate plan in the first place or update an existing estate plan:
WHO PAYS THE BILLS?
While the primary purpose of most Wills or Trust Agreements is to designate who inherits your property, attention should also be given to who will pay the debts, taxes, expenses of administration, maintenance and repair of property. Where all or some of the heirs maybe under the care of a legal guardian, directions should be provided and arrangements made to reimburse the guardian for each additional expenses, including housing and transportation. Dividing expenses the same way you divide property is not always fair.
WHO GETS THE PERSONAL PROPERTY?
Most family feuds start over division of personal property rather than money. Emotions often run high and in-laws don’t help matters. Florida Law provides a very easy means to leave instructions concerning personal property and which don’t require constant trips back to your lawyer’s office to amend or update your instructions.
WHO IS IN CHARGE?
The appointment of one or more Personal Representative in a Will or Trustees in a Trust Agreement is often a difficult choice. Sometimes the wrong choice is made based on location, business experience or age. More important qualifications may be the abilities to delegate, supervise and communicate. In many circumstances, it may also be appropriate to select or include a third party or professional fiduciary. In preparing or updating your estate plan, be sure and talk to your advisors about the selection of both primary and backup legal representative of Trustees.
ARE THERE ANY TAX ISSUES?
The maximum federal estate tax rate in 2009 is 45%. If real estate is owned outside the State of Florida, separate and additional estate debt taxes may apply. In turn to ignore these taxes in favor of a simple estate plan is the same as listing the government as your favorite heir. While tax exemptions in various other means exist to reduce or avoid these taxes, they do not happen automatically. In addition, changes in the federal estate tax laws could be expected. An even up to date estate plan may require future revisions. Beside possible estate taxes, significant income taxes may arise on individual retirement accounts, pension plans and other forms of deferred compensation. While not easy to avoid, options do exist to defer these income taxes.
IS THERE A BUSINESS TO SELL OR CONTINUE?
Business succession planning will be the subject of future articles. Prevailing the business or professional practice has been the primary source of family support, will often vanish or quickly diminish without careful planning or good management. Where such a business exists, the Will or Trust Agreement should confirm the arrangements for the sale or continuation of that business in the hands of qualified managers.
DOES THE WILL OR TRUST AGREEMENT CONTROL THE ASSETS?
Previous articles have discussed the common estate planning mistake of not letting a Will or Trust Agreement control such substantial assets as life insurance, property, retirement plans, or jointly owned property. Exception in many cases, these types of assets pass outside the terms of a Will or Trust Agreement. It may be distributed:
1. To either the wrong people, or to the right people too early;
2. A Trust Agreement that is not properly funded; or
3. A Will that does not control important assets, is not worth the paper it is written on.
READ AND UNDERSTAND ANY ESTATE PLANNING DOCUMENTS YOU ARE SIGNING
Leases, mortgages and many other types of legal agreements are signed without reading the fine print. While this may be safe if the fine print cover terms you may not intent to violate, both Wills and Trust Agreements are not your usual legal agreements. Broiler plate provisions do exist to avoid court intervention, provide for tax election and confirm the authority of designated Personal Representatives or Trustees. Nonetheless, you should ask for an explanation of any provision that is not clear or its purpose apparent.
Following is a checklist of Estate Planning issues you should discuss with your advisors, whether to establish an estate plan in the first place or update an existing estate plan:
WHO PAYS THE BILLS?
While the primary purpose of most Wills or Trust Agreements is to designate who inherits your property, attention should also be given to who will pay the debts, taxes, expenses of administration, maintenance and repair of property. Where all or some of the heirs maybe under the care of a legal guardian, directions should be provided and arrangements made to reimburse the guardian for each additional expenses, including housing and transportation. Dividing expenses the same way you divide property is not always fair.
WHO GETS THE PERSONAL PROPERTY?
Most family feuds start over division of personal property rather than money. Emotions often run high and in-laws don’t help matters. Florida Law provides a very easy means to leave instructions concerning personal property and which don’t require constant trips back to your lawyer’s office to amend or update your instructions.
WHO IS IN CHARGE?
The appointment of one or more Personal Representative in a Will or Trustees in a Trust Agreement is often a difficult choice. Sometimes the wrong choice is made based on location, business experience or age. More important qualifications may be the abilities to delegate, supervise and communicate. In many circumstances, it may also be appropriate to select or include a third party or professional fiduciary. In preparing or updating your estate plan, be sure and talk to your advisors about the selection of both primary and backup legal representative of Trustees.
ARE THERE ANY TAX ISSUES?
The maximum federal estate tax rate in 2009 is 45%. If real estate is owned outside the State of Florida, separate and additional estate debt taxes may apply. In turn to ignore these taxes in favor of a simple estate plan is the same as listing the government as your favorite heir. While tax exemptions in various other means exist to reduce or avoid these taxes, they do not happen automatically. In addition, changes in the federal estate tax laws could be expected. An even up to date estate plan may require future revisions. Beside possible estate taxes, significant income taxes may arise on individual retirement accounts, pension plans and other forms of deferred compensation. While not easy to avoid, options do exist to defer these income taxes.
IS THERE A BUSINESS TO SELL OR CONTINUE?
Business succession planning will be the subject of future articles. Prevailing the business or professional practice has been the primary source of family support, will often vanish or quickly diminish without careful planning or good management. Where such a business exists, the Will or Trust Agreement should confirm the arrangements for the sale or continuation of that business in the hands of qualified managers.
DOES THE WILL OR TRUST AGREEMENT CONTROL THE ASSETS?
Previous articles have discussed the common estate planning mistake of not letting a Will or Trust Agreement control such substantial assets as life insurance, property, retirement plans, or jointly owned property. Exception in many cases, these types of assets pass outside the terms of a Will or Trust Agreement. It may be distributed:
1. To either the wrong people, or to the right people too early;
2. A Trust Agreement that is not properly funded; or
3. A Will that does not control important assets, is not worth the paper it is written on.
READ AND UNDERSTAND ANY ESTATE PLANNING DOCUMENTS YOU ARE SIGNING
Leases, mortgages and many other types of legal agreements are signed without reading the fine print. While this may be safe if the fine print cover terms you may not intent to violate, both Wills and Trust Agreements are not your usual legal agreements. Broiler plate provisions do exist to avoid court intervention, provide for tax election and confirm the authority of designated Personal Representatives or Trustees. Nonetheless, you should ask for an explanation of any provision that is not clear or its purpose apparent.
Monday, July 13, 2009
Common Mistakes in Physcian Asset Protection Planning
Any Physician named as a Defendant in a malpractice lawsuit can tell you there is a world of difference between the “what if” world of asset planning and the “what now” world of real litigation. While the vast majority of lawsuits are settled before trial and within policy limits, the resolution of one bad experience is no guarantee that another bad experience won’t follow it in the future.
At least some of the stress and concerns about financial security can be relieved by reviewing what asset protection is available and avoiding certain common mistakes.
ASSETS HELD IN MARITIAL JOINT NAMES (Tenancies by the Entirety):
Simply putting of the husband’s and wife’s name on the same asset title does not automatically protect that asset from the creditors of one spouse. The marital status of the owners must be clearly identified on the Deed for account title (e.g. Harry Jones and Sandy Jones his wife or Harry Jones and Sandy Jones Tenants by the Entirety). Common mistakes in this area include certificates of investments in privately held companies entitled to out of state real estate. The mare fact that the owners listed on the title are married does not automatically create marital protection.
Another common mistake occurs after one spouse is faced with an actual lawsuit for potential claim that could exceed insurance coverage. At that point, the spouse “at risk” should ask the questions “what happens to the joint marital property if my spouse dies before or after this lawsuit is over?” The answer in all cases is that the joint marital property loses its’ protection and can then be attached by a judgment creditor. In the face of a real threat, joint marital ownership is no guarantee of asset protection other steps (e.g. spendthrift Trust) must be taken.
HOMESTEAD PROPERTY:
The Florida Constitution provides absolute and unlimited protection against attachment of a “Florida homestead” whether owned in joint marital names or in a singe name. However, this asset protection extents only to one half acre inside a municipality and 160 acres outside the municipality. The lots and many upscale residential areas exceed one half acre and are not protected by the Florida Constitution.
RETIREMENT PLANS AND INDIVIDUAL RETIREMENT ACCOUNTS:
Besides being a good financial and tax planning option, qualified retirement plans and individual retirement accounts are fully exempt from creditors under both state and federal law. The key word in the last sentence is “qualified”. While the IRS may allow you to correct discrepancies in coverage, contribution and permitted investments, a creditor may be able to seize Plan assets due to these technical defects. If asset protection is a concern, use of experienced third party plan administers is a must.
BENEFICIARY DESIGNATIONS AND INHERITANCES:
One of the most common mistakes occurs when an otherwise fully protected position unexpectedly receives life insurance proceeds, retirement plan benefits or an inheritance. While such assets may have been fully protected on the previous name of a spouse or other family member, that protection is lost the minute it is received by the beneficiary or heir. Asset Protection Trust should be used in the case of life insurance, annuities, or retirement plan assets payable to a Physician as beneficiary. In the case of a future inheritance a candid discussion with other family members may be necessary, no matter how difficult.
PRACTICE ASSETS:
A common concern and common mistake is the protection of accounts receivable. Leveraged life insurance “protection” programs are often promoted as a means for both large and small medical groups to shield their accounts receivable. In my opinion, these programs costs too much, provide uncertain protection and may result in IRS tax issues. Simpler and cheaper solutions include: (i) Pledging the accounts receivable toward a revolving line of credit to be used if and when necessary; (ii) Pledging the accounts receivable as additional security toward medical office lease payments (if the medical office is owned by related parties).
MALPRATICE AND OTHER LIABILITY INSURANCE COVERAGE:
The debate will never end whether minimum coverage is enough or extra coverage makes the Physician a “target”. Experienced Plaintiff and Defense attorneys alike can attach a “price” on almost any malpractice lawsuit once the full extent of permanent injury is ascertained. While many “worst case” injuries are still within minimum policy limits, certain procedures on certain patients can have catastrophic results. In my opinion, Physicians who perform high risk-high injury procedures should increase their coverage. The stress and worry of defending the claim for two or three times insurance coverage is a great deal worst that the extra premium expense.
Whether minimum or greater malpractice insurance is purchased, be certain the insurance company is solvent and determine if defense costs are “included” or in addition to the stated coverage amount. The legal fees and expert witness expense to fully defend a lawsuit through the stage of a jury trial can be expected to exceed $75,000.
In the case of other types of lawsuits (e.g., automobile negligence, teenage drivers and parties without adult supervision), every parent and every person with assets worth protecting should have “umbrella” liability insurance of at least $3 million (preferably $5 million).
LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES (LLC) AND OTHER GROUP ENTITIES:
LLC’s have become the entity of choice for group ownership of medical offices and substantial practice assets. Because the creditor of an individual member is only to entitled to a “charging order”, a member’s interest cannot be directly attached and the creditor cannot interfere with the operation of the LLC. However, the day will eventually come when the other members of the LLC will want to refinance, sell or otherwise make distributions as a return on their investments. At the time of such distributions, the charging order creditor can attach a member’s share and the asset protection of the LLC is lost.
In the case of a group medical practice, many LLC Operating Agreements are written to allow Physician Ownership only and to provide for forced sale in the event of a member’s bankruptcy or other financial trouble. In the case of all such group investments, the following questions should be asked and answered:
1. Can ownership be held by another protected entity (e.g., spouse or another LLC)?
2. Is the purchase of a distressed member’s interest mandatory or discretionary?
3. Is each member fully liable (jointly and severally) for the debts of the LLC or just their proportion and share?
TRENDS AND TRIBULATIONS:
While the states of Alaska and Nevada has been promoting themselves as asset protection havens, they have yet to be any federal court decisions on the effectiveness of this strategy. For those Physicians facing “last resort” asset protection planning, several offshore jurisdictions still offer the best “and most expensive” options.
As a result of one single Bankruptcy Court decision in Colorado, many advisors have become skeptical of singe member LLC’s. Because Florida law expressly limits creditors of a LLC member to charging order protection only, single member LLC’s remain a valid asset protection option in Florida. Where appropriate, additional LLC members (e.g., other family members eliminate this Bankruptcy Court issue altogether.
Given the recent opportunity to either expand or restrict various asset protections statutes, the Florida Legislature has favored increasing rather than reducing asset protection options.
Tuesday, July 7, 2009
Business Succession Planning - Part 2
The previous article on business succession planning described why such planning is important and that it is seldom accomplished without outside help. Besides tax, accounting and legal issues involved in any change of ownership, succession planning in a family or closely-held business also involves personal relationships that can both help and hinder the process.
In the minds of many current “senior” owners succession planning is seen as the first step towards retirement and their own morality. These emotions mixed with and often accurate assessment of the abilities of the younger generation results in procrastination, reluctance and even rejection of proposed changes.
In the case of the younger generation, or aspiring new owners, what needs to be said is often left unsaid because the communication between business partners is different than between parents and their children. Rather than expressing disagreement or constructive criticism, both generation, but especially the younger generation, may either remain silent or simply abandon the process.
While any type of business planning will benefit from the “team” approach, committed succession planning may need the added ingredient of family counseling. A few such firms exist and can often salvage a business succession plan that is in danger due to personal conflicts.
The older generation is entitled to keep what they earned, have certain financial security and a post-retirement role to plat if they want it. The younger generation is entitled to respect for their own abilities, a chance to succeed and the right to make a few mistakes. The older generation should remember that they probably made a few mistakes of their own.
In-laws are a “wild card” in every family situation. In-laws can be the best or worst influence and are often both the sounding board for silent frustration and force behind final confrontation. If mom and dad consider themselves a “team”, they should have no less respect for the support showed by a daughter-in-law or son-in-law. A family or a personal relationship that prompts business owners to pursue succession problem create its own set of obstacles. Like obstacles to any objective, they can cause defeat or be dealt with as something to be expected. In the next article we will cover how to spot and develop good successors.
In the minds of many current “senior” owners succession planning is seen as the first step towards retirement and their own morality. These emotions mixed with and often accurate assessment of the abilities of the younger generation results in procrastination, reluctance and even rejection of proposed changes.
In the case of the younger generation, or aspiring new owners, what needs to be said is often left unsaid because the communication between business partners is different than between parents and their children. Rather than expressing disagreement or constructive criticism, both generation, but especially the younger generation, may either remain silent or simply abandon the process.
While any type of business planning will benefit from the “team” approach, committed succession planning may need the added ingredient of family counseling. A few such firms exist and can often salvage a business succession plan that is in danger due to personal conflicts.
The older generation is entitled to keep what they earned, have certain financial security and a post-retirement role to plat if they want it. The younger generation is entitled to respect for their own abilities, a chance to succeed and the right to make a few mistakes. The older generation should remember that they probably made a few mistakes of their own.
In-laws are a “wild card” in every family situation. In-laws can be the best or worst influence and are often both the sounding board for silent frustration and force behind final confrontation. If mom and dad consider themselves a “team”, they should have no less respect for the support showed by a daughter-in-law or son-in-law. A family or a personal relationship that prompts business owners to pursue succession problem create its own set of obstacles. Like obstacles to any objective, they can cause defeat or be dealt with as something to be expected. In the next article we will cover how to spot and develop good successors.
Monday, July 6, 2009
Succession Planning
We can all remember our favorite restaurants or other small business that closed upon the death or retirement of its’ owners. We can also think of a restaurant or other small business that was never quite the same after its owners sold out. Between these two results is what estate planners call the challenging world of “Business Succession Planning.”
In the world of small businesses, more fail than succeed at succession planning and even more fail to even attempt succession planning. While we can all point to automobile dealerships or other examples of successful transition between one generation and the next, these success stories are more the exception than the rule. Looking behind the scenes of these “success stories”, you often find disappointment, hard feelings, and even lawsuits. Having participated myself in a number of both failures and success stories, the two main ingredient of success are good parenting and good advise. While some family businesses can rely on a product or franchise that will succeed on its own, most small business owners face constant challenges of government regulations, competition and taxes. It is no wonder that so many small business owners are both too tired to continue and too busy to quit. A family committed to succession planning and a smooth transition of control between generations face a daunting challenge. Succession planning is not a short term project or a task that many business owners can accomplish without outside help.
Unfortunately, many advisors who provide good legal, accounting, and insurance or investment counsel face succession planning challenges in their own business. While my next few articles will discuss succession planning for a family business many of the points and pitfalls apply to any business or to the passing of wealth between generations. The older generations often needs as much training in their role as the younger generation. In my next article, we will start by speaking to the current owners about how to succeed in succession planning. The children or other perspective new owners will get their turn, including the responsibility they have to look in both directions as the mantle is passed.
In the world of small businesses, more fail than succeed at succession planning and even more fail to even attempt succession planning. While we can all point to automobile dealerships or other examples of successful transition between one generation and the next, these success stories are more the exception than the rule. Looking behind the scenes of these “success stories”, you often find disappointment, hard feelings, and even lawsuits. Having participated myself in a number of both failures and success stories, the two main ingredient of success are good parenting and good advise. While some family businesses can rely on a product or franchise that will succeed on its own, most small business owners face constant challenges of government regulations, competition and taxes. It is no wonder that so many small business owners are both too tired to continue and too busy to quit. A family committed to succession planning and a smooth transition of control between generations face a daunting challenge. Succession planning is not a short term project or a task that many business owners can accomplish without outside help.
Unfortunately, many advisors who provide good legal, accounting, and insurance or investment counsel face succession planning challenges in their own business. While my next few articles will discuss succession planning for a family business many of the points and pitfalls apply to any business or to the passing of wealth between generations. The older generations often needs as much training in their role as the younger generation. In my next article, we will start by speaking to the current owners about how to succeed in succession planning. The children or other perspective new owners will get their turn, including the responsibility they have to look in both directions as the mantle is passed.
Friday, July 3, 2009
Estate Planning Lessons from the Rich and Famous
Despite the jokes on late night TV, the continuing saga of Anna Nicole Smith and the pending birth of Vice President Cheney’s sixth grandchild by a lesbian daughter point out that “Paternity” can affect any family and any estate plan. Without passing judgment on some modern beliefs or lifestyles, estate planning must now take into account such future family possibilities as gay unions, cross culture or same sex adoptions, sperm banks, stem cell research and children born or raised outside conventional marriages.
“Paternity” means the acknowledgment of a parental relationship. Paternity can be a very serious estate planning matter when that acknowledgment is disputed or when it involves an heir that is not what the parents or grandparents may have expected.
Following are some general rules of paternity that apply in most states:
1. A husband is presumed to be the father of the children born to their wife;
2. Children are provided certain limited inheritance and support rights, but only until they attain the age of majority;
3. Both biological and adoptive parents are free to exclude or disinherit all or some of their children (subject to Rule # 2 above);
4. If a written and valid estate plan does not exist, the state law of a decedent’s legal residence governs the order of inheritance (known as “intestate succession”). The intestate succession laws of most states provide that all born or adopted lineal descendants are the rightful heirs of the decedent; and
5. A written and valid estate plan can exclude or place conditions on inheritance by both known and unknown heirs, provided no law is broken and the estate plan does not violate “public policy”. Your guess is as good as mine as to what laws may exist or what public policy will be in the future.
Following are examples of circumstances that exist in many families and where ignoring paternity or the difference among heirs could have unintended results:
FAMILY BELIEFS:
John and Mary are active members of their church and have bestowed the same beliefs on their only child, Jim. John and Mary’s estate plan provides for outright distribution to Jim, or if deceased, to three grandchildren born during son’s Jim’s prior marriage. One of the grandchildren has recently renounced the family and joined a satanic cult. To make matters worse, son Jim has been diagnosed with a terminal illness.
THE “MISSING” GRANDCHILD:
Walt and Sarah have three sons and six grandchildren. Unfortunately, the oldest son’s marriage ended when he was sent to prison for stock fraud and the daughter in law was awarded sole custody of their only child. The daughter in law has since moved out of state and refuses to allow Walt and Sarah any contact with this grandchild. Walt and Sarah has typical Wills that divide their estate equally among their three sons, “per stirpes” (which means to the surviving children of any deceased son).
THE “IMPAIRED” HEIR:
Thanks to the family business, Widow Sally and both of her daughters (see Mary and Sarah above) are very wealthy. On the advice of her estate planning attorney, Sarah has created “generation skipping” trusts that provide for some direct distributions to each of her current or after born grandchildren in order to reduce or at least delay the amount of estate taxes to be paid in the future. Besides the one great grandchild who has recently joined the satanic cult and another great grandchild who is estranged from the family, there is a family history of substance abuse and mental disorders.
As these examples show, parents and especially grandparents may need to create special safeguards such some heirs need to be treated differently than other heirs. In addition to dealing with known circumstances, parents and grandchildren may need to also address the possibility of unknown circumstances as both scientific and social changes continue in our society.
Following are some of various recommendations that the families described above may want to consider in their estate plans:
1. Rather than providing for equal division and outright distribution, some heirs are better protected by extended trust arrangements managed by am independent Trustee. If circumstances later change and the same heirs gain maturity or stability in their lives, then the Trustee can be authorized to “loosen the reins”.
2. Despite instructions to make distribution at a certain age, it may be appropriate to permit a Trustee to delay or modify the form of that distribution should an heir then be afflicted with a medical condition or be under threat of a legal attachment by creditors.
3. Some future heirs may benefit from a “carrot and stick” form of distribution that ties the amount they will receive to the amount fair earning through gainful employment.
4. In those cases where an independent Trustee has been designated, one or more “Trust Protectors” should also be designated. Such Trust Protectors are typically family members or close friends not burdened with the duties of Trustees but who have the authority to mediate disputes, approve or disapprove distributions or select a substitute independent Trustee in the future.
5. As a final recommendation, grandparent should consider giving their own children the limited ability to modify those shares of an estate that will be or maybe payable to grandchildren. If properly drafted, this limited power has no tax consequences, but does enable a family to look further into the future.
On final bit of advice – if you intent to exclude someone as a beneficiary of a Will or Trust, language along the following lines is appropriate: In providing for the foregoing division and distribution of my estate, I have in mind my son, Harry, but for whom I expressly chose to make no provision under this Will. Leaving a token $1 can create headaches for those responsible to administer the estate, by the same token, failing to mention a person who has been listed as a previous beneficiary or would normally be a beneficiary could raise concerns about over sight, competence, or undue influence.
“Paternity” means the acknowledgment of a parental relationship. Paternity can be a very serious estate planning matter when that acknowledgment is disputed or when it involves an heir that is not what the parents or grandparents may have expected.
Following are some general rules of paternity that apply in most states:
1. A husband is presumed to be the father of the children born to their wife;
2. Children are provided certain limited inheritance and support rights, but only until they attain the age of majority;
3. Both biological and adoptive parents are free to exclude or disinherit all or some of their children (subject to Rule # 2 above);
4. If a written and valid estate plan does not exist, the state law of a decedent’s legal residence governs the order of inheritance (known as “intestate succession”). The intestate succession laws of most states provide that all born or adopted lineal descendants are the rightful heirs of the decedent; and
5. A written and valid estate plan can exclude or place conditions on inheritance by both known and unknown heirs, provided no law is broken and the estate plan does not violate “public policy”. Your guess is as good as mine as to what laws may exist or what public policy will be in the future.
Following are examples of circumstances that exist in many families and where ignoring paternity or the difference among heirs could have unintended results:
FAMILY BELIEFS:
John and Mary are active members of their church and have bestowed the same beliefs on their only child, Jim. John and Mary’s estate plan provides for outright distribution to Jim, or if deceased, to three grandchildren born during son’s Jim’s prior marriage. One of the grandchildren has recently renounced the family and joined a satanic cult. To make matters worse, son Jim has been diagnosed with a terminal illness.
THE “MISSING” GRANDCHILD:
Walt and Sarah have three sons and six grandchildren. Unfortunately, the oldest son’s marriage ended when he was sent to prison for stock fraud and the daughter in law was awarded sole custody of their only child. The daughter in law has since moved out of state and refuses to allow Walt and Sarah any contact with this grandchild. Walt and Sarah has typical Wills that divide their estate equally among their three sons, “per stirpes” (which means to the surviving children of any deceased son).
THE “IMPAIRED” HEIR:
Thanks to the family business, Widow Sally and both of her daughters (see Mary and Sarah above) are very wealthy. On the advice of her estate planning attorney, Sarah has created “generation skipping” trusts that provide for some direct distributions to each of her current or after born grandchildren in order to reduce or at least delay the amount of estate taxes to be paid in the future. Besides the one great grandchild who has recently joined the satanic cult and another great grandchild who is estranged from the family, there is a family history of substance abuse and mental disorders.
As these examples show, parents and especially grandparents may need to create special safeguards such some heirs need to be treated differently than other heirs. In addition to dealing with known circumstances, parents and grandchildren may need to also address the possibility of unknown circumstances as both scientific and social changes continue in our society.
Following are some of various recommendations that the families described above may want to consider in their estate plans:
1. Rather than providing for equal division and outright distribution, some heirs are better protected by extended trust arrangements managed by am independent Trustee. If circumstances later change and the same heirs gain maturity or stability in their lives, then the Trustee can be authorized to “loosen the reins”.
2. Despite instructions to make distribution at a certain age, it may be appropriate to permit a Trustee to delay or modify the form of that distribution should an heir then be afflicted with a medical condition or be under threat of a legal attachment by creditors.
3. Some future heirs may benefit from a “carrot and stick” form of distribution that ties the amount they will receive to the amount fair earning through gainful employment.
4. In those cases where an independent Trustee has been designated, one or more “Trust Protectors” should also be designated. Such Trust Protectors are typically family members or close friends not burdened with the duties of Trustees but who have the authority to mediate disputes, approve or disapprove distributions or select a substitute independent Trustee in the future.
5. As a final recommendation, grandparent should consider giving their own children the limited ability to modify those shares of an estate that will be or maybe payable to grandchildren. If properly drafted, this limited power has no tax consequences, but does enable a family to look further into the future.
On final bit of advice – if you intent to exclude someone as a beneficiary of a Will or Trust, language along the following lines is appropriate: In providing for the foregoing division and distribution of my estate, I have in mind my son, Harry, but for whom I expressly chose to make no provision under this Will. Leaving a token $1 can create headaches for those responsible to administer the estate, by the same token, failing to mention a person who has been listed as a previous beneficiary or would normally be a beneficiary could raise concerns about over sight, competence, or undue influence.
Monday, June 1, 2009
Asset Protection for Florida Residents
While people in financial trouble often resort to bankruptcy to protect their assets and stop collection harassment, new federal laws take effect later this year that will limit that option. Florida law provides Florida residents with other options.
Following is a brief description of the major exemptions and other ways Florida residents can protect their assets:
1) HOMESTEAD PROPERTY – the Florida Constitution provides that the homestead property of Florida residents is exempt from attachment by creditors. This protection does not apply to mortgages or liens that are recorded against the homestead or most contents in the homestead. Only homestead property one-half (1/2) acre or less inside a municipality and 160 acres outside a municipality is protected. The new federal bankruptcy law will restrict this exemption for some future Florida residents.
2) JOINT MARITAL PROPERTY - real estate, bank accounts, investments and other property owned jointly by a husband and wife as “tenants by the entirety” cannot be attached to satisfy the debts of only one spouse. This protection may not extend to taxes owed the Internal Revenue Service or to jointly owned property that does not qualify as tenants by the entirety or includes additional joint owners.
3) RETIREMENT PLANS AND IRA ACCOUNTS - both federal and Florida law protect a debtor’s retirement account assets. This protection may be lost if the retirement plan is not qualified under federal law or has been established to defraud creditors.
4) ANNUITIES AND LIFE INSURANCE - Florida law provides Florida residents with creditor protection for the cash value held in annuity contracts and life insurance policies. Death benefits paid on the life of a debtor are also exempt. This protection may not apply to the annuity and life insurance beneficiaries themselves.
5) WAGES AND WAGE ACCOUNTS – both federal and Florida law provide some protection from garnishing the wages of a Head of family. Certain types of wage only accounts established in financial institutions may also be protected.
6) LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES AND PARTNERSHIPS – Compared to corporation stock or general partnership interests, attachment of a Debtor’s interest in these type of legal entities is restricted under Florida law and in many other states.
Readers are cautioned that the asset protection options described above are in general terms only. Exceptions and pitfalls exist that will be discussed in a future article. Readers who are debtors and creditors alike are encouraged to recognize these options and to work together toward settlements that avoid bankruptcy.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
